Does higher degree of monopoly imply worse results for output and employment?

Autores/as

  • Alejandro Rodríguez Arana Universidad Iberoamericana

Palabras clave:

monopoly, inter-industry coalition, intra-industry coalition, prices, wage

Resumen

In an economy producing n symmetric goods (where n is an integer number equal or greater than one), monopolistic competition produces smaller output and employment than perfect competition. The inferiority of the equilibrium is directly related to the number of goods produced and to the returns of labour on production (when there is just one good perfect competition and monopoly are equivalent). Therefore, inter-industry coalitions among monopolistic competitors approach the economy to the perfect competition equilibrium. In the limit, when all monopolistic competitors collude, the ex ante recognition of symmetries implies an identical equilibrium than perfect competition.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Ackley (1961), Macroeconomics, McMillan.

Akerlof, G. and J. Yellen (1985). “A near rational model of the business cycle, with wage and price inertia”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100 (supplement), pp. 823-838.

Akerlof, G. et al. (2000). “Near rational wage and price setting and the optimal rates of inflation and unemployment”, (http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/akerlof/docs/inflation-employm.pdf).

Bergin, P. and R. Feenstra (1998). “Staggered price setting and endogenous persistence”, (http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/workingpapers/workingpaperPDF/98-05.pdf).

Ball, L. and D. Romer (1990). “Real rigidities and the nonneutrality of money”, Review of Economic Studies, 57, pp. 183-203.

Blanchard, O. and N. Kiyotaki (1987). “Monopolistic competition and the effects of aggregate demand”, American Economic Review, 77, pp. 647-666.

Blanchard, O. and S. Fischer (1989). Lectures on Macroeconomics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: The MIT Press.

Fischer, S. (1977). “Long term contracts, rational expectations and the optimal money supply rule”, Journal of Political Economy, 85, pp. 191-205.

Hahn, F. H. (1983). Money and Inflation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: The MIT Press.

Hart, O. (1985). “Imperfect competition in general equilibrium: an overview of recent work”, Arrow K. and S. Honkapohja (eds), Frontiers of Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Lipsey, R. y K. Lancaster (1956). “The general theory of the second best”, Review of Economic Studies, 24, pp. 11-36.

Mankiw, G. (1985). “Small menu costs and large business cycle: A macroeconomic model of monopoly”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100, pp. 529-539.

McDonald, I. and R. Solow (1981). “Wage bargaining and employment”, American Economic Review, 71, pp. 896-908.

Romer, D. (1996). Advanced Macroeconomics, McGraw Hill.

Rotemberg, J. (1982). “Monopolistic Price Adjustment and Aggregate Output”, Review of Economic Studies, 49, pp. 517-531.

Solow, R. (1979). “Another possible source of wage stickiness”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 1, pp. 79-82.

Taylor, J. (1980). “Aggregate dynamics and staggered contracts”, Journal of Political Economy, 88, pp. 1-23.

__________ (1979). “Staggering wage setting in a macro model”, American Economic Review, 69, pp. 108-113.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-07-12

Cómo citar

Rodríguez Arana, A. (2024). Does higher degree of monopoly imply worse results for output and employment?. Análisis Económico, 22(51), 107–122. Recuperado a partir de https://analisiseconomico.azc.uam.mx/index.php/rae/article/view/1279

Artículos similares

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.