The social dilemma of corruption: normalization, incentives and reciprocity

Authors

  • José Luis Hernández Mota Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco

Keywords:

Anti-Corruption Policies, Collective Action, Impunity, Incentives, Reciprocity

Abstract

The article aims to establish an overview of the phenomenon of corruption and the failure of anticorruption policies. Analytically the fight against anticorruption focuses on the possibility of collective action as a non-institutional, unexpected form of participation that can break with inertia, fear, passivity, and social inaction in the face of corruption. Under the hypothesis that the role of trust and integrity of individuals are conditioning factors for the construction of a collective action capable of dealing with corruption, the analysis allows us to deduce that the effectiveness of collective action in the fight against corruption will depend on their ability to shape decisions, over and above the incentives inherent to corruption and the reciprocal relationships of social groups.

JEL Classification: C33, D72, O43.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • José Luis Hernández Mota, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco

    Profesor Investigador de Tiempo Completo de la UAM Azcapotzalco, Departamento de Economía.

References

Abbink, K., Irlenbusch, B. & Renner, E. (2002). An experimental bribery game. Journal of Law, Economics, And Organization, 18(2), 428-454. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/18.2.428

Aidt, T.S. (2003). Economic analysis of corruption: a survey. Economic Journal, 113(8). F632-F652. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0013-0133.2003.00171.x

Aidt, T.S., Dutta, J. & Sena, V. (2010). Governance regimes, corruption, and growth: theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(2), 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.11.004

Al-Jundi, S., Shuhaiber, A., y Al-Emara, S. S. (2022). The effect of political instability and institutional weakness on administrative corruption. Contemporary Economics, 16(2), 168-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.475

Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: a review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320-46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729979

Bar-Tal, D. (1976). Pro-social behavior. Theory and Research. New York: Halsted Press.

Becker, G.S. (1968). Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394

Becker, G.S. & Stigler, G.J. (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. Journal of Legal Studies, 3(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1086/467507

Bendor, J. & Mookherjee, D. (1987). Institutional structure and the logic of ongoing collective action. The American Political Science Review, 81(1), 129-154. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960782

Bayaert, A., García-Solanes, J. & Lopez-Gomez, L. (2023), Corruption, quality of institutions and growth. Applied Economic Analysis, 31(91), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEA-11-2021-0297

Bukovanski, M. (2006). The hollowness of anticorruption discourse. Review of International Political Economy, 13(2), 181-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290600625413

Campos, N.F. & Giovannoni, F. (2006). Lobbing, Corruption and Political Influence. Discussion Paper 2313. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). https://ftp.iza.org/dp2313.pdf

Campos, N.F., Dimova, R. & Saleh, A. (2016). Corruption and economic growth: an econometric survey of the evidence. Journal of Institutional and Theorical Economics, 172(3), 521-543. https://doi.org/10.1628/093245616X14616712130543

Coronado, G. (2008). Discourses of anti-corruption in Mexico: culture of corruption or corruption of culture? Portal Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 5(1), 1-23.https://doi.org/10.5130/portal.v5i1.479

D’Agostino, G., Dunne, J.P. & Pieroni, L. (2016). Corruption and growth in Africa. European Journal of Political Economy, 43(June), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.03.002

De Graaf, G. (2007). Causes of corruption: towards a contextual theory of corruption. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 39-86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288282

Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V. & Teorell, J. (2012). The merit of meritocratization: politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 656–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911408109

Dumitrescu, E.I. & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014

Egger, P. & Winner, H. (2005). Evidence on corruption as an incentive for foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(4), 932-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.01.002

Elliot, K.A. (2000). La Corrupción en la Economía Global. México: Limusa/Noriega Editores.

Fan, C. S., Lin, C., y Treisman, D. (2009). Political Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence from Around the World. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.001

Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.159

Fisman, R. & Miguel, E. (2006). Cultures of Corruption: evidence from diplomatic parking tickets. Working Paper. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w12312

Freille, S., Haque, M. E., y Kneller, R. (2007). A contribution to the empirics of press freedom and corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 838–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2007.03.002

Gnimassoun, B., y Massil, J. K. (2019). Determinants of corruption: Can We Put All Countries in the Same Basket? The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 16, 239-276.

Graf, J. (2015). Preventing corruption by Promoting Trust: Insights from behavioral science. Passauer Diskussionspapiere–Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe, No. V-69-15, Universität Passau, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Passau. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3563.4006

Groenendijk, N. (1997). A principal-agent model of corruption. Crime, Law & Social Change, 27, 207-229. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008267601329

Gründler, K. & Potrafke, N. (2019). Corruption and Economic Growth: New Empirical Evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 60, 101810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.08.001

Hellman, J.S., Jones, G. y Kaufman, D. (2001). Capture al Estado, capture el día. Captura del Estado, corrupción e influencia en la transición. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, (21), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.vi21.262

Hodgson, G. y Jiang, S. (2008). La economía de la corrupción y la corrupción de la economía: una perspectiva institucionalista. Revista de Economía Institucional, 10(18), 55-80. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/ecoins/article/view/67

Huang, C. (2016). Is corruption bad for economic growth? Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 35, 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2015.10.013

Huntington, S. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies, New Heaven: Yale University Press.

Husted, B.W. (1999). Wealth, culture, and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 339-359. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490073

Jain, A.K. (2001). Corruption: a review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00133

Kaase, M. & March, A. (1979). Distribution of political action. In Barnes, S.H. & Kaase, M. (eds.). Political Action. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Kaufman, D. (2011). Governance and the Arab World Transition: Reflection, Emperies, and Implications for the International Community. Washington: Brookings Institution Briefs. https://www.brookings.edu/research/governance-and-the-arab-world-transition-reflections-empirics-and-implications-for-the-internationalcommunity/

Kaufman, D. & Vicente, P.C. (2011). Legal corruption. Economics & Politics, 23(2), 195-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2010.00377.x

Khan, S. (2022). Investigating the effect of income inequality on corruption: new evidence from 23 emerging countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2100-2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00761-6

Klein, M. (2011). Enrichment with growth. Working Paper Series 172. Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Frankfurt a. M. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/50549/1/669137790.pdf

Kolstad, I., y Wiig, A. (2016). Does Democracy Reduce Corruption? Democratization, 23(7), 1198–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1071797

La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 15(1), 222-279. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.222

Lederman, D., Loayza, N. & Reis Soares, R. (2001). Accountability and Corruption: Political Institutions Matter. Working Paper No. 2708. Washington: The World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19420

Levy, D. (2007). Price adjustment under the table: evidence on efficiency-enhancing corruption. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 423-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2007.01.001

Marquette, H. & Peiffer, C. (2015a). Corruption and Collective Action. Research Paper 32. Birmingham: DLP. https://gsdrc.org/document-library/corruption-and-collective-action/

Marquette, H. & Peiffer, C. (2015b). Collective Action and Systemic Corruption. Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions Workshop, Warsaw: University of Warsaw.https://baselgovernance.org/publications/collective-action-and-systemic-corruption

Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681-712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696

Meón, P.G. & Weill, L. (2010). Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development, 38(3), 244-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.004

Merino, M. (2013). La captura de los puestos públicos. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 58(219), 135-156. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1918(13)72306-7

Morris, S.D. (2016). La corrupción en México a través de los años: continuidad y cambio. Revista Este País, 306. https://estepais.com/impreso/la-corrupcion-en-mexico-a-traves-de-los-anos-continuidad-y-cambioprimera-de-dos-partes/

Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2013). Controlling corruption through collective action. Journal of Democracy, 24(1), 101-115. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0020

Myint, U. (2000). Corruption: causes, consequences, and cores. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 7(2), 33-58. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/apdj-7-2-2-Myint.pdf

OECD (2020). Global Lessons on Collective Action Against Corruption – The Case of Morocco, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/mena/competitiveness/Global-lessons-on-collective-actionagainst-corruption-Case-of-Morocco.pdf

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Edición en español: La Lógica de la Acción Colectiva. México: Limusa-Noriega Editores. 1992.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Persson, A., Rothstein, B. & Teorell, J. (2013) Why anti-corruption reforms fail: systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 26(3), 449–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x

Rock, M. T. & Bonnett, H. (2004). The comparative politics of corruption: accounting for the East Asian paradox in empirical studies of corruption, growth, and investment. World Development, 32(6), 999-1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.12.002

Rose-Ackerman, S. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 4(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(75)90017-1

Rose-Ackerman, S. (2009). Economía política de las raíces de la corrupción: investigación y políticas públicas. En Sandoval, I.E. (Coord.). Corrupción y Transparencia: Debatiendo las fronteras entre Estado, mercado y sociedad. México: Siglo XXI/IIS-UNAM.

Ross, S.A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–9. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1817064

Rothstein, B. (2011). Anti-corruption: the indirect “big bang” approach. Review of International Political Economy, 18(2), 228–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692291003607834

Rothstein, B. & Stolle, D. (2008). The State and social capital: an institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4). 441-459. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041508X12911362383354

Samuelson, P. A. (1937). Some aspects of the pure theory of capital. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(3), 469- 496. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884837

Slovic, P & Västfjäll, D. (2015). The more who die, the less we care psychic numbing and genocide. En Kaul, S. & Kim, D. (Eds.). Imagining Human Rights. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter. 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110376616-005

Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the World: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Working Paper WP/98/63, International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department.

Tanzi, V. & Davoodi, H. (2000). Corruption, growth, and public finances. Working Paper WP/00/182, International Monetary Fund Fiscal Affairs Department.

Vértiz G., M.A. (1999). El combate a la corrupción en los trámites administrativos. Una aproximación teórica. Gestión y Política Pública, 9(2), 305-349. https://www.gestionypoliticapublica.cide.edu/ojscide/num_anteriores/Vol.IX_No.II_2dosem/VGM_Vol.9_No.II_2sem.pdf

Vial, V. & Hanoteau, J. (2010). Corruption, manufacturing plant growth, and the Asian paradox: Indonesian evidence. World Development, 38(5), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.022

Wedeman, A. (2002). Development and corruption: the East Asian paradox. In E.T. Gómez (ed.) Political Business in East Asia. London: Routledge. 34–61.

The World Bank, (2000). Anticorruption in Transition: A contribution to the policy debate. Washington:The World Bank.

Zalpa, G., Tapia, E. y Reyes, J. (2014). “El que a buen árbol se arrima…” Intercambio de favores y corrupción. Cultura y Representaciones Sociales, 9(17), 148-176. https://www.culturayrs.unam.mx/index.php/CRS/article/view/371

Downloads

Published

2024-09-02

Issue

Section

Artículos de investigación

How to Cite

The social dilemma of corruption: normalization, incentives and reciprocity. (2024). Análisis Económico, 39(102), 7-31. https://analisiseconomico.azc.uam.mx/index.php/rae/article/view/1046

Similar Articles

1-10 of 101

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.