Diferencias de eficiencia entre micronegocios formales e informales en México

Authors

  • Antonio Baez Morales Universidad de Guanajuato

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/ae/2022v37n96/Baez

Keywords:

informalidad, micronegocios, eficiencia, productividad, método de descomposición

Abstract

Las microempresas pueden ser vistas como potenciales canales de crecimiento, una gran proporción de los micronegocios también pueden ser vistos como signos de un sistema productivo subdesarrollado. Esta investigación hace la separación de micronegocios formales e informales para evaluar si hay diferencias entre estos grupos. Una de las novedades del estudio es el uso del método de descomposición Oaxaca-Blinder. Los micronegocios en México son tomados como caso de estudio, con el uso de la ENAMIN para los años de 2008, 2010 y 2012. La evidencia empírica sugiere que las diferencias de output pueden ser explicadas por las características de dotación, mientras que las diferencias de eficiencia son explicadas por los retornos de las dotaciones. Las principales variables para explicar la brecha entre grupos formales e informales son los niveles de educación, la edad del micronegocio, las motivaciones del dueño para abrir el negocio y el financiamiento.

Clasificación JEL: D00; D22; D24.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Antonio Baez Morales, Universidad de Guanajuato

    University of Guanajuato. Mexico.

References

Aguilar Barceló, J. G., Mungaray Lagarda, A., Ledezma Torres, D., Hernández Campos, C. M., and Texis Flores, M. (2012). La microempresarialidad informal en México durante los años noventa: un análisis de la dinámica de flujos laborales. Región Y Sociedad, 24(54), 05–33.

Alter, M. (2012). The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies. Women in Informal Economy Globalizing and Organizing: WIEGO Working Paper,1.

Akoten, J. E., Sawada, Y., and Otsuka, K. (2006). The determinants of credit access and its impacts on micro and small enterprises: The case of garment producers in Kenya. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(4), 927–944.

Ardagna, S., and Lusardi, A. (2008). Explaining international differences in entrepreneurship: The role of individual characteristics and regulatory constraints. National Bureau of Economic Research, April.

Benjamin, N. C., and Mbaye, A. A. (2012). The Informal Sector, Productivity, and Enforcement in West Africa: A Firm-level Analysis. Review of Development Economics, 16(4), 664–680.

Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 436–455.

Bosch, M., and Maloney, W. F. (2010). Comparative analysis of labor market dynamics using Markov processes: An application to informality. Labour Economics, 17(4), 621–631.

Cárdenas, M. and Rozo, V. S. (2009) Firm Informality in Colombia: Problems and Solutions. Desarrollo y Sociedad (63):211–43.

Castany, L. (2007). Essays on total factor productivity, innovation, education and training: the role of size in Spanish manufacturing firms (Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain).

Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., Krizan, C. J., Miranda, J., Nucci, A., and Sandusky, K. (2007). Measuring the dynamics of young and small businesses: Integrating the employer and nonemployer universes. National Bureau of Economic Research, 9.

De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., and Woodruff, C. (2010). Who are the microenterprise owners? Evidence from Sri Lanka on Tokman versus De Soto. In International differences in entrepreneurship (pp. 63–87). University of Chicago Press.

Fajnzylber, P., Maloney, W., and Rojas, G. M. (2006). Microenterprise dynamics in developing countries: How similar are they to those in the industrialized world? Evidence from Mexico. The World Bank Economic Review, 20(3), 389–419.

Fajnzylber, P., Maloney, W. F., and Montes-Rojas, G. V. (2011). Does formality improve micro-firm performance? Evidence from the Brazilian SIMPLES program. Journal of Development Economics, 94(2), 262–276.

Farrell, D. (2004). The hidden dangers of the informal economy. McKinsey Quarterly 2004, 3, 26–37.

Gelb, A., Mengistae, T., Ramachandran, V., and Shah, M. K. (2009). To Formalize or not to formalize? Comparisons of microenterprise data from Southern and East Africa. Center for Global Development, Working paper, 175.

Gennaioli, N., Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2013). Human capital and regional development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 105-64.

Heino, H. (2006). Use of borrowed start-up capital and micro enterprises in Mexico: existence of liquidity constraints. Portuguese Economic Journal, 5(1), 1–30.

Hendy, R., and Zaki, C. (2013). On informality and productivity of micro and small enterprises: Evidence from MENA countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 19(4), 438–470.

Hernández-Trillo, F., Pagán, J. A., and Paxton, J. (2005). Start-up capital, microenterprises and technical efficiency in Mexico. Review of Development Economics, 9(3), 434–447.

Hurst, E., and Pugsley, B. W. (2011). What do small businesses do?. National Bureau of Economic Research, w17041.

INEGI (2014) La informalidad Laboral. Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo. Marco Conceptual y Metodológico. Webpage of Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.

Jaramillo, M. (2009). Is there Demand for Formality among Informal Firms. Evidence from Microfirms in Downtown Lima. German Development Institute Discussion Paper 12/2009.

Lagarda, A. M., and Urquidy, M. R. (2007). Capital humano y productividad en microempresas. Investigación Económica, 66(260), 81–115.

La Porta, R. and Shleifer, A. (2008). The unofficial economy and economic development. National Bureau of Economic Research, w14520.

La Porta, R., and Shleifer, A. (2014). Informality and development. National Bureau of Economic Research, w20205.

Levy, S. (2010). Good intentions, bad outcomes: Social policy, informality, and economic growth in Mexico. Brookings Institution Press.

Loayza, N., Servén, L., and Sugawara, N. (2009). Informality in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, 4888.

Mano, Y., Iddrisu, A., Yoshino, Y., and Sonobe, T. (2012). How can micro and small enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa become more productive? The impacts of experimental basic managerial training. World Development, 40(3), 458–468.

McKenzie, D. J., and Woodruff, C. (2006). Do entry costs provide an empirical basis for poverty traps? Evidence from Mexican microenterprises. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(1), 3–42.

Masatlioglu, Y., and Rigolini, J. (2008). Informality traps. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 8(1).

Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693-709.

Otero, R., Pagán, J., and Lovett, S. (2013). Microenterprise Origins and Efficiency in Mexico. International Journal of Business and Economics, 12(1), 73–83.

Perry, G., Maloney, W., Arias, O., Fajnzylber, P., Mason, A., and Saavedra, J. (2007). Informality: Exit and Exclusion, World Bank Latin America and Caribbean Studies. World Bank, Washington DC.

Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312–320.

Steel, W. F., and Snodgrass, D. (2008). World Bank Region Analysis on the Informal Economy. Raising Productivity and Reducing Risk of Household Enterprises Diagnostic Methodology Framework. For WEIGO Network and World Bank PREM Network. Draft Sept.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-01

How to Cite

Diferencias de eficiencia entre micronegocios formales e informales en México. (2022). Análisis Económico, 37(96), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/ae/2022v37n96/Baez

Similar Articles

1-10 of 119

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.